Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the panel, about the document. In an attempt to comply with the subpoena, FBI officials came to the Capitol on Monday to brief Comer and Maryland Rep. “Protecting the identities and information provided by confidential human sources from unnecessary disclosure or undue influence is therefore critical not only because of safety concerns but also to avoid chilling their candor or willingness to continue reporting to the FBI,” Christopher Dunham, an acting FBI assistant director, wrote to Comer last month. The bureau has pushed back Comer’s threats to hold Wray in contempt and warned of grave risk to confidential human sources and the law enforcement process if the FBI record were released to the public. What to know about the clash between Republicans and the FBI: Release of the document in question, FBI officials have warned, would jeopardize the safety of the confidential human source who received the unverified tip. They accuse the bureau of harboring bias against conservatives dating back to Donald Trump’s presidency and allege the bureau is now stonewalling legitimate congressional oversight.
#Redacted tonight mcdonalds full
The resolution to hold Wray in contempt - which would have to be approved by the full House - is just the latest broadside from Republicans against the FBI. He says the FBI has failed to comply with a lawful subpoena for an FBI record that documents an unverified tip about President Joe Biden. James Comer, the Republican chairman of the House Oversight Committee, has scheduled a committee vote for Thursday morning on the contempt resolution against Wray. Want more consumer news? Visit our parent organization, Consumer Reports, for the latest on scams, recalls, and other consumer issues.WASHINGTON (AP) - The yearslong feud between congressional Republicans and the FBI is reaching a new level of rancor as lawmakers prepare a resolution to hold bureau director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress. Something is terrible wrong at this store, and if it’s going to be fixed, customers never returning without saying why won’t be the reason.
Sarah, it’s a really good idea to bring all of this up to someone, even if it’s just sending this same e-mail that you sent to Consumerist to Quizno’s corporate or the franchise owner. I didn’t bring this all up to anyone there and I probably won’t, I have already made up my mind to not go there again. This was by far the worst visit to Quiznos I have ever had. Not to mention the fact that they made my husband the wrong sandwich entirely and the place was so smoky from burning sandwiches in the toaster that it made my eyes burn.
There are so many things different between the menu picture and what I paid for its ridiculous.
The listed ingridents for the Baja Chicken sandwich are Chicken, bacon, cheddar, red onions, Mild Chipotle Mayo, Sweet & Smoky Baja Sauce.Īs you can see from my picture they decided to swap out the red onions and the Baja sauce for lettuce. Now I’m not stupid and I understand that what you see is never what you get but is it really to much to ask that it at least be in the general vicinity? I went to Quiznos in today for lunch and ordered the Baja Chicken sandwich. She was served something that sort of resembled a Baja Chicken sandwich, but wasn’t much like it at all. Looking at the pictures she sent in and the description of what happened, we can see why. Sarah writes that her recent experience at Quiznos was bad enough that she doesn’t plan to ever return. 9.2.10 11:30 AM EDT By Laura Northrup quizno's subs ad vs reality fast-food
0 kommentar(er)
